Two-Way Fixed Effects and DiD with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Causal Question / Estimand

A survey of what two-way fixed-effects (TWFE) regressions estimate when treatment effects are heterogeneous, and what alternative estimands and estimators recover interpretable averages of unit-time effects (Causal-Estimand).

Identification Strategy

Reviews the now-standard result that TWFE coefficients are weighted sums of unit-time treatment effects with weights that can be negative, so a single TWFE number need not equal any sensible average effect. Catalogues the heterogeneity-robust alternatives (Callaway–Sant’Anna, Sun–Abraham, de Chaisemartin–D’Haultfœuille, Borusyak et al., Wooldridge) and the assumptions each requires. Re-examines Wolfers (2006) on divorce laws to show the differences in practice.

Key Assumptions

Parallel-Trends (and often strong/conditional versions), No-Anticipation, and an honest account of Treatment-Effect-Heterogeneity. The survey’s organizing theme is that TWFE silently assumes effect homogeneity; dropping that assumption exposes Negative-Weighting.

Threats to Validity

n/a — survey. Its cautionary message: TWFE estimates can be misleading (even sign-reversed) under heterogeneous effects; robust estimators differ in their comparison groups, weighting, and treatment of covariates, so the choice matters.

Setting / Data

n/a — methodological survey. Empirical illustration: revisiting Wolfers (2006a) on unilateral divorce laws and divorce rates.

Key Claims

  • TWFE regressions are extremely common (26 of the 100 most-cited 2015–2019 AER papers) yet vulnerable to heterogeneity bias.
  • A fast-growing literature provides estimators robust to heterogeneous effects; the survey maps their assumptions and trade-offs.
  • Practitioners should report weights/diagnostics and prefer robust estimators when effects plausibly vary across groups or time.

Connections

Citation

de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2023). Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey. The Econometrics Journal, 26(3), C1–C30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac017